Friday, September 03, 2010
Latest Amsterdam, New York, weather
Venner Vox   |  

Home

News
Local news
Opinion
School news
Church schedules

Sports
Local sports news
Local sports briefs

Classifieds

The Scene
2008 Firefighter of the Year program
Area Holiday Concerts
Centro Civico party
December Snow Storms
Festa Italiana
Festival of Trees
Lore Koppel retires
New Year's Eve - Canajoharie-Palatine CC
OFA Picnic
Veterans Day 11/11/08
WHLynch Class of 58
Witches party

Email Updates

Engagement

Birth

Anniversary

Wedding

Feedback

Search


Advanced Search
home : news : opinions September 03, 2010

5/24/2009 Email this articlePrint this article 
Districts should pay attention to voters

Recorder News Staff

Taxpayers in the Greater Amsterdam and Broadalbin-Perth school districts voted down budgets in their respective school districts on Tuesday, perhaps making statements about pay increases for administrators.

It may have only been a coincidence, but residents of both school districts had criticized board members for granting pay raises to administrators during tough economic times. If that was the motivation behind any dissenting voters, it will probably not make a difference as the pay raises are likely to stand.

The GASD Board of Education voted Wednesday to resubmit the proposed 2009-10 budget for a re-vote on June 16. According to state law, districts are allowed to present budgets for public vote a second time if they are defeated initially. The board can rework the budget for the second vote or leave it intact. It appears that Amsterdam will choose the latter, since it was narrowly defeated.

If the budget is defeated a second time, the district will have to adopt a contingency budget that will be reduced by approximately $200,000 from the proposed budget. According to board members, pay raises will remain while custodial positions, sports programs or student activities could be cut to make up the difference.

In the Broadalbin-Perth Central School District, where the proposed budget of $28,005,010 was voted down for the third time in the past five years, board members haven't decided on their next move.

The board plans to meet Tuesday to discuss its options. Like Amsterdam, raises for administrators were an issue in the B-P district, along with that district's teacher's union offering minimal concessions like offering to chaperone after-school events for free, which many voters likely saw as arrogant and insulting.

We believe the district should listen to voters and eliminate or lessen the pay raises for the upcoming year. If they're not willing to do so, voters should think twice about defeating the budget a second time, since it will be students and hourly employees who will suffer.

Granted, the pay increases will remain regardless if a second budget vote succeeds or fails. But removing them will at least tell voters the two school districts are willing to balance the needs of the schools against the people who foot the bill.



Article Comment Submission Form
Please feel free to submit your comments.

Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it.

Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
Name:
E-mail:
Passcode: This form will not send your comment unless you copy exactly the passcode seen below into the text field. This is an anti-spam device to help reduce the automated email spam coming through this form.

Please copy the passcode exactly
- it is case sensitive.
Message:
   
Subscriber Login:
Last Name: 
Subscriber Number: 











Site content copyright 2010 Wm. J. Kline & Son, Inc.
Software © 1998-2010 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved